-
Hospitals are required to stabilize anyone experiencing a medical emergency. Two lawsuits question whether that includes performing an abortion, despite state laws.
-
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, has accused a federal district court that spans North Texas and the Panhandle of assigning cases in a way that allows cases filed in certain areas to consistently land in front of judges who may be sympathetic to a plaintiff or defendant's goals.
-
At issue is the FDA's regulatory power to approve drugs and continually evaluate their safety — a system that until now has been widely viewed as the gold standard for both safety and innovation
-
The state agency will collect public comment on the proposed rule for at least 30 days before it can be considered for final approval.
-
Contraception options are available through most health insurance plans and government-funded clinics.
-
The state agency is responding to a petition from two attorneys to clear up ambiguity about when emergency abortions are allowed
-
Texas has gone to court to fight federal efforts that would save the life of a mother if an emergency abortion is medically necessary.
-
Doctors across the South reflect on the landscape of abortion rights now on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade.
-
There was a substantial increase in requests by people who were not pregnant after the U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision was leaked.
-
A federal appeals court in New Orleans says the Biden administration cannot use a 1986 emergency care law to require that Texas hospitals provide abortions for women whose lives are at risk due to pregnancy.
-
For the first time in 22-years women are running the top organization responsible for electing Latino Democrats to Congress. They say they know how to win with abortiona as a driving force.
-
Legal and reproductive rights experts are concerned over a lack of clarity for emergency abortions after the ruling in Cox v. Texas.